JCSAI | Journal of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence
← Back to Volume 7, Issue 1

Cross-Modal Alignment in Multimodal Large Language Models: Mechanisms, Challenges, and Future Directions

Wenlong Lu
Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 56-59, 2026 DOI: 10.54097/ge4cjn12 April 30, 2026
Download PDF
Abstract.As a significant breakthrough in recent years for artificial intelligence research, multimodal large-scale language models have extended the ability of language models across multiple dimensions, including vision and hearing, into non-linguistic forms through technical processes such as cross-modal alignment. Examine the mechanisms, problems and future paths for cross-modal alignment in multimodal large-scale language models based on representations learned by using the theory of representation learning, transformer-based attention mechanism and information-theoretical framework as core references. Three interrelated arguments are put forward: Cross-modal alignment is no longer a one-shot technical task but rather comprises three distinct paths: contrastive learning, cross-modal attention fusion, and instruction-based fine-tuning; The main problems faced by the research on cross-modal alignment, such as modality gap, hallucination, data bias and evaluation difficulties, all stem from their intrinsic diversity among various representation modes. Therefore, some promising future directions should be explored, which includes precise semantic alignment, extension to videos or soundscapes, developing transparent interpretation systems to help people better understand the system, etc. This paper presents an empirical integration of the rapid evolution of a highly dynamic technological system for researchers studying multimodal alignment in related disciplines.
Keywords. Multimodal large language models cross-modal alignment contrastive learning vision-language models hallucination representation learning transformer architecture
APA Citation Wenlong Lu (2026). Cross-Modal Alignment in Multimodal Large Language Models: Mechanisms, Challenges, and Future Directions. Journal of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, 7(1), 56-59. https://doi.org/10.54097/ge4cjn12

References

  1. Vaswani A, Shazeer N, Parmar N, et al. Attention is all you need. arXiv. 2017. arXiv:1706.03762.
  2. Radford A, Kim JW, Hallacy C, et al. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In: Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR; 2021. p. 8748–8763.
  3. Alayrac JB, Donahue J, Luc P, et al. Flamingo: A visual language model for few-shot learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 2022; 35:23716–23736.
  4. Li J, Li D, Savarese S, Hoi S. BLIP-2: Bootstrapping language-image pre-training with frozen image encoders and large language models. arXiv. 2023. arXiv:2301.12597.
  5. Liu H, Li C, Wu Q, Lee YJ. Visual instruction tuning. arXiv. 2023. arXiv:2304.08485.
  6. Bengio Y, Courville A, Vincent P. Representation learning: A review and new perspectives. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. 2013; 35(8):1798–1828.
  7. Dosovitskiy A, Beyer L, Kolesnikov A, et al. An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations. 2021. arXiv:2010.11929.
  8. Rohrbach A, Hendricks LA, Burns K, Darrell T, Saenko K. Object hallucination in image captioning. In: Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. ACL; 2018. p. 4035–4045.
  9. Wang P, Yang A, Men R, et al. OFA: Unifying architectures, tasks, and modalities through a simple sequence-to-sequence learning framework. In: Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR; 2022. p. 23318–23340.
  10. OpenAI. GPT-4 Technical Report. arXiv. 2023. arXiv:2303.08774.